SDP8010 – Oficina de Produção de Artigo Científico 2 (Referencial Quantitativo)

EMENTA

Discussão sobre a produtividade e produtivismo acadêmico; Debate sobre processos como a submissão de artigos a revistas, revisão por pares, autoria, política editorial, plágio e fraudes; prática de redação científica.

BIBLIOGRAFIA

Carnero AM, Mayta-Tristan P, Konda KA, et al. Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru. Science and engineering ethics. 2017;23(4):1183-1197.

Carpenter CR, Cone DC, Sarli CC. Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2014;21(10):1160-1172.

Davis D. A practical overview of how to conduct a systematic review. Nurs Stand. 2016; 31(12): 60-71.

Elliott David B. Salami slicing and the SPU: Publish or Perish?. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013, 33, 625-626.

Garner RM, Hirsch JA, Albuquerque FC, et al Bibliometric indices: defining academic productivity and citation rates of researchers, departments and journals Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery Published Online First: 20 August 2017.

Jackowski M. Writing conclusions. Radiol Technol. 2010;82(1):98-9. Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part III: introduction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):702.

Juyal D, Thawani V, Thaledi S, Prakash A. The fruits of authorship. Educ Health 2014;27:217-20.

Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part IV: methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(8):817.

Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part V: results. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(9):945.

Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part VI: discussion. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(10):1064.

Markowitz DM, Hancock JT (2014) Linguistic Traces of a Scientific Fraud: The Case of Diederik Stapel. PLoS ONE 9(8): e105937.

Pautasso M (2013) Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Comput Biol 9(7): e1003149.

Rennie D. Let’s make peer review scientific. Nature. 2016;535(7610):31-3.

Stretton S. Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e004777.

Welch SJ. Selecting the right journal for your submission. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2012;4(3):336-338.

Weller AC. Editorial policy and the assessment of quality among medical journals. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 1987;75(4):310-316.